HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MU‘TAZILITE THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL OF THOUGHT
Abstract
The paper examines the historical development of Mu'tazilite theological school of thought which arises from speculative method and influences of Greek thought that sparked the discursive tradition of early Islamic intellectual history. This was essentially brought forth by the textualist and rationalist school and their classical debate that had formative influence in the rational school developed by the Mu'tazilites in the early centuries. The paper studies the history and development of Mu'tazilite theology and their conceptual and doctrinal impact on modern neo-Mu'tazilite works. The study is based on classical works that provide underlying textual and interpretive history of Mu'tazilism. It uses qualitative method based on documentary survey and content analysis. Data were collected from related primary and secondary sources and analyzed using descriptive, normative, historical and theological approaches in order to make accurate findings. The finding shows that the Mu'tazilites ideology was historically developed to counter the alleged philosophical influence of deviant sects of the heretics, Magians, Manichaeism, atheism, naturalists and materialists by refuting their philosophical premises. This contributes to the formative development of kalam or speculative theology thanks to the flowering of Mu'tazilite theology and their rational expression that helps to foster higher ethical and religious norms and theological ideas and its consequential influences on contemporary contexts that espouses neo-Mu'tazilite outlook calling for the return of reason and their enlightened movement.
References
Amin, A. (1977). Duha al-Islam (Cet. Ke-9). Maktabat al-Nahdah al-Misriyah.
Analiansyah. (2013). Peran Akal dan Kebebasan Bertindak dalam Filsafat Ketuhanan Mu‘tazilah. Jurnal Substantia, 15(1), 91–103.
Ayub. (2021). Mu‘tazila in Western Scholarship: Their Origin, Originality and Legacy. Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 1(2), 80–103.
Azra, A. (1992). Konteks Berteologi di Indonesia. Paramedina.
Baharudin, M. (2010). Paham Teologi Rasional Mu‘tazilah di Indonesia. Al-Adyan, V(1), 99–104.
Dahlan, A. A. (2001). Teologi dan Akidah dalam Islam. IAIN Imam Bonjol.
Dick, H. (1986). Orientasi di dalam Filsafat. Gramedia.
Eliza. (2011). Kontribusi Muktazilah dalam Penyebaran Dakwah Islam. 3, 91–101.
Fatawi, M. F. (2020). Al-Mu‘tazilah wa Mushkilah al-Hurriyah al-Insaniyah (Kata Pengantar Edisi Melayu). Islamic Renaissance Front.
Hamka. (2018). Prinsip dan Kebijaksanaan Dakwah Islam. Gema insani.
Hanafi, A. (1983). Pengantar Theologi Islam. Pustaka al-Husna.
Harahap, E. W., Fadillah, U., Nasution, N., Prasetyo, B., Sitohang, F. Y., Sari, A. P., & Daulay, M. S. (2024). Epistemologi Pemikiran Mu’tazilah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam di Indonesia. Mimbar Kampus: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Agama Islam, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.47467/mk.v23i2.3725
Hoodbhoy, P. (2002). Muslims and the West After September 11. Free Inquiry Magazine, 22(2).
Imarah, M. (2020). Muktazilah dan Persoalan Kebebasan Insan. Islamic Renaissance Front.
Kerr, M. H. (1966). Islamic Reform: The Political and Legal Theories of Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida. University of California Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/islamic-reform-the-political-and-legal-theories-of-muhammad-abduh-and-rashid-rida-by-malcolm-h-kerr-berkeley-university-of-california-press-1966-pp-vii-249-695/A404EDF4E54DFCAC13E82260ADD23D83
Khaidir, P. H. (2020). Al-Mu‘tazilah wa Mushkilah al-Hurriyah al-Insaniyah (Rangsang Sari Edisi Melayu). Islamic Renaissance Front.
Khaidir, R. Z. (2020, June 2). Muhammad Imarah dan Islam Wasatiyah. IBTimes.ID. https://ibtimes.id/muhammad-imarah-dan-islam-wasatiyah/
Lawrence, B. B. (1989). Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age. Harper & Row.
Madelung, W. (1965). Der Imam al-Qasim ibn Ibrahim und die Glaubenslehre der Zaiditen.
Martin, R. C., Woodward, M. R., & Atmaja, D. S. (1997). Defenders of Reason in Islam: Mu’tazilism from medieval School to modern Symbol. Oneworld Publications.
Muhyidin, & Nasihin. (2020). Rasionalitas Teologi Mu‘tazilah. Ummul Qura Jurnal Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat, 15(1), 757–758.
Nasution, H. (1978). Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran, Sejarah, Analisa, Perbandingan. Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Pakpahan, E. S. (2017). Pemikiran Mu‘tazilah. 2(2), 413–423.
Rahman, F. (1992). Islam. Bumi Aksara.
Rohidin, R. (2018). Mu’tazilah: Sejarah dan Perkembangannya. EL-AFKAR : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v7i2.1595
Supriyanto. (2023). Periodisation of the Philosophy of Islamic Rationalism in the Perspective of Zaki Naguib Mahmud. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–7.
Zahrah, I. M. A. (1996). Aliran Politik dan Aqidah dalam Islam. Logos.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal SAMBAS (Studi Agama, Masyarakat, Budaya, Adat, Sejarah): Journal of Religious, Community, Culture, Custome, History Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
