Menyoal Framework Agama: Upaya Rekonsiliasi HAM Berat 1965

  • Yulius Edward Indra Doris Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana Malang
Keywords: Framework, religion, reconciliation, love, gross human rights

Abstract

The author's focus in this article is to question the religious framework in viewing the 1965 gross human rights case as one of the reconciliation efforts. Reconciliation of 1965 Gross Human Rights is an important effort to build peace and unity in Indonesia, especially in facing the political year. It is also important for the creation of peaceful politics. However, this effort faces challenges, one of which is the religious framework in viewing the 1965 Gross Human Rights case. The method used in this analysis is a historical study of the 1965 gross human rights violations case, especially regarding the role and involvement of religions in responding to this case. This article offers a religious framework that is more inclusive and emphasizes the characteristics of a religion of peace and love. This framework is based on the principles of humanity, justice and equality. The findings of this research are a new framework of religion that is broader and more open in viewing the 1965 Gross Human Rights Case that emphasizes love. This new framework is the basis for reconciliation for the Indonesian people. It is hoped that from this new framework, all elements of the nation can accept it so that the 1965 Gross Human Rights case has the same perspective in terms of religion. This is expected to bring political stability in Indonesia and free the Indonesian people from the 1965 Serious Human Rights issue.

References

Al-Fayyadl, M. (2013). Dari Benturan ke Konsolidasi: Tentang NU dan Buku Putih 1965 | NU Online. Retrieved 11 September 2023, from https://www.nu.or.id/opini/dari-benturan-ke-konsolidasi-tentang-nu-dan-buku-putih-1965-PmjXg

Ardilla, M., Indri, I., Wahyuni, I. L., Pare, E. T., & Tappi, P. (2023). Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Moderasi Beragama Dalam Bingkai Pendidikan Agama Kristen. JIP: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(4), 629–643. Retrieved 29 October 2023 from https://jip.joln.org/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/65

Ashri, A. M., & Syawal. (2023). Potret Hukum Diskriminatif Orde Baru: Tinjauan Hukum dan Politik atas Diskriminasi Terhadap Eks Tahanan Politik PKI. Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 4(2), 221–243. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp

Azizurrochim, & Imam Sanusi Al Khanafi, M. (2023). Kerangka Dasar Agama Dalam Buku Wawasan Al-Qur’an Karya M. Quraish Shihab (Kajian Al-Qur’an Dengan Pendekatan Sosiologi Agama). Al-Shamela : Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies, 1(1), 54–69. Retrieved 29 October 2023 from http://jurnal.dokicti.org/index.php/ALSHAMELA/article/view/37

Chris Haryanto, H. (2016). Apa Manfaat dari Agama? (Studi Pada Masyarakat Beragama Islam di Jakarta). InSight, XIII(1), 19–31.

Dwi Madyo Utomo, K. (2023). Panggilan Gereja dalam Realitas Ketidakadilan di Indonesia. Forum, 52(1), 13–24. Retrieved 12 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.35312/FORUM.V52I1.538

Fransiskus Gultom, A. (2019). Metafisika Kebersamaan Dalam Lensa Gabriel Marcel. In Antropologi Metafisika & Isu-Isu Kekinian (p. 130). Bantul: CV Lintas Nalar.

Haganta, K., & Arrasy, F. (2021). Agama, Modernisme, dan Kepengaturan: Agama Lokal Pasca-1965. Panangkaran: Jurnal Penelitian Agama Dan Masyarakat, 5(1), 29–47. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2021.0501-02

Husin, S. (1989). Pengantar Metodologi Riset. Jakarta: Fajar Agung.

Junadi, Y. (2020). Status Agama Dalam Kehidupan Publik Perspektif HAM Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 6(2), 190–220. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/jmj

Khoirun, K. (2015). Sang Penumpas Kebengisan PKI. Mimbar Pembangunan Agama, 34–35.

Kuntowijoyo. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Lon, Y. (2020). HAM dan Hukuman Mati Menurut Aturan Gereja Katolik: Implikasi Pastoralnya di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 12(1), 1–11. Retrieved 12 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.36928/JPKM.V12I1.206

Magnis Suseno, F. (2015). Kebangsaan-Demokrasi-Pluralisme. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Mun’im Dz, A. (2013). Benturan NU-PKI 1948-1965. Jakarta.

Najib Yuliantoro, M. (2013, December 17). Lagi, Tentang NU dan ‘Buku Putih’ 1965. Indoprogress.Com. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://indoprogress.com/2013/12/lagi-tentang-nu-dan-buku-putih-1965/

Nashih Luthfi, A. (2017). Sejarah dan Revitalisasi Perjuangan Pertanian Nahdlatul Ulama Melawan Ketidakadilan Agraria. Bhumi, 3(2), 145–159.

Pambudi, K. S., & Suhanti, I. Y. (2017). Penelitian Studi Kasus Fenomenologi Persepsi Keadilan Pelaku Pembunuhan Anggota PKI 1965. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 6(1), 22–30. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.17977/UM023V6I12017P22-30

Pinardi, S. (2017). Absennya NU dalam hiruk pikuk isu PKI. Retrieved 11 September 2023, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/655606/absennya-nu-dalam-hiruk-pikuk-isu-pki

Putri, G. C. (2020). Seni untuk Damai: Upaya Rekonsiliasi Akar Rumput pasca Tragedi 1965. Masyarakat Indonesia, 44(2), 48–59. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.14203/JMI.V44I2.809

Rahawarin, Y. (2013). Kerjasama Antar Umat Beragama: Studi Rekonsiliasi Konflik Agama di Maluku dan Tual. Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 7(1).

Riyanto, A. (2013). Menjadi Mencintai. Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius.

Riyanto, A. (2018). Relasionalitas Filsafat Fondasi Interpretasi: Aku, Teks, Liyan, Fenomen. Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius.

Sanita, M., & Rianto, P. (2018). Hantu PKI dan Ujung Rekonsiliasi. Jurnal Komunikasi, 12(2), 153–166.

Sufyan, M. A., & Khairiyah, K. (2023). HAM Dalam Perbincangan Dua Agama Islam dan Katolik. TOLERANSI: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama, 15(1), 49–59. Retrieved 12 September 2023 from https://doi.org/10.24014/TRS.V15I1.24510

Sukamto, A. (2015). Dampak Peristiwa G30S Tahun 1965 Terhadap Kekristenan Di Jawa, Sumatera Utara Dan Timor. Amanat Agung, 11(1), 85–129.

Triharyanto, B. (2020, October 8). Pasca G30S 1965, Sejarawan Baskara T. Wardaya, SJ: “Gereja Katolik Tak Terlibat” – KATOLIKANA. Katolikana.Com. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://www.katolikana.com/2020/10/03/pasca-g30s-1965-sejarawan-baskara-t-wardaya-sj-gereja-katolik-tak-terlibat/

Truly Estrelita, G. (2021, May 18). Pendekatan Humanis Gereja Katolik pada Tahanan Politik Terduga Komunis Pasca 1965. The Conversation. Retrieved 11 September 2023 from https://theconversation.com/pendekatan-humanis-gereja-katolik-pada-tahanan-politik-terduga-komunis-pasca-1965-157314

Wahid, A. (2007). Gus Dur Menjawab Kegelisahan Rakyat. Jakarta: Kompas.

Zuhdan, M. (2019). Demokrasi Bukan Untuk PKI: Pengeklusian Hak-Hak Politik Kaum Komunis Pasca Reformasi di Indonesia. International Journal of Demos, 1(3), 382–393. Retrieved from http://hk-publishing.id/ijd-demos

Published
2023-11-16
How to Cite
Indra Doris, Y. E. (2023). Menyoal Framework Agama: Upaya Rekonsiliasi HAM Berat 1965. JURNAL ILMIAH FALSAFAH: Jurnal Kajian Filsafat, Teologi Dan Humaniora, 10(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.37567/jif.v10i1.2468