Implementation of Maqashid al-Syariah in Islamic Criminal Law in Muslim Countries: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia
Abstract
This article analyzes the implementation of Maqasid Syariah in criminal law in four. This research examines the implementation of Maqashid Sharia in Islamic criminal law in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia and Indonesia by highlighting the variations in implementation based on each country's legal system. Saudi Arabia and Iran fully implement Islamic criminal law, while Malaysia and Indonesia adopt it to some extent through their national legal systems. This study also assesses the extent to which Islamic criminal law in the four countries safeguards the five main aspects of Maqashid Sharia, namely religion, soul, mind, offspring, and property, and examines its effectiveness in upholding justice and social order. The main research question posed is: how is Maqasid Syariah implemented in the criminal law systems in these countries, and to what extent are these principles in line with human rights and national law? This study uses a qualitative approach with a library study method, where data is obtained from academic literature, legal documents, and related articles. The research findings show that the implementation of Maqasid Syariah varies from country to country depending on their respective socio-political contexts. The study found that the implementation of Maqashid Sharia in Islamic criminal law in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia and Indonesia varies, with Saudi Arabia and Iran implementing it strictly, while Malaysia and Indonesia adopted it in a dual legal system. The academic contribution lies in the comparative analysis of the effectiveness of Islamic criminal law in achieving justice and the challenges of harmonization with human rights. Its application can be a reference for policy makers in designing a more adaptive Islamic criminal law system, balanced between Islamic law and the demands of modernity.
References
Afandi, F., & Bagaskoro, L. R. (2024). ISLAM AND STATE’S LEGAL PLURALISM:The Intersection of Qanun Jinayat and Criminal JusticeSystem in Indonesia. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 19(01), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2024.19.01.1-26
Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debat. Yale University Press.
Al-Ghazali, & Hamid, A. (1997). Maqasid al-Shariah: The Objective of Islamic Law. Harvard University Press.
Aluwaisheg, A. (2021, May). Saudi legal reforms to follow international norms. Arabnews.
Anggraeni, R. D. (n.d.). Islamic Law and Customary Law in Contemporary Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and Constraints. Ahkam, 23(1), 2023–2048.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Azam, M., & Adil, M. (n.d.). Syariah Criminal Code (II) Enactment 1993 Amendment 2015: Can Kelantan Enforce Hudud?
Badran, M. (2009). Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences. Oxford University Press.
binti Yusof, W. (2024). A Pre-Trial Standard Operation Procedure for Children in Conflict with Sharia Criminal Law in Malaysia. Samarah, 8(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16097
Casduloh. (2023). History of Criminal Law Enforcement and Islamic Justice in Saudi Arabia. Al-Mahkamah: Islamic Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61166/mahkamah.v1i1.3
Din, M., & Abubakar, A. Y. (2021). The Position of the Qanun Jinayat as a Forum for the Implementation of Sharia in Aceh in the Indonesian Constitution. Samarah, 5(2), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10881
Fitria, W., & Subakti, G. E. (2022). Era Digital dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, 18(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.20414/jpk.v18i2.5196
H Ammar, N. (2014). Stoning Women in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Is It Holy Law or Gender Violence. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 05(01). https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000063
Halim, A. (2022). Non-Muslims in the Qanun Jinayat and the Choice of Law in Sharia Courts in Aceh. Human Rights Review, 23(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00645-x
Haliza Nur Madhani, Maulina Maulina, Muhammad Wildan, & Surya Sukti. (2024). Perbandingan Legislasi Hukum Pidana Islam Di Indonesia dan Beberapa Negara Muslim Lainnya. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 1(3), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i3.252
Harahap, B., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Karjoko, L. (2023). Non-Muslims and Sharia-Based Regional Government; Comparison between Aceh, Indonesia and Selangor, Malaysia. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial, 18(2), 364–392. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i2.10456
Hermawan, E., & Arifin, A. L. (2021). What Expert Say about Empowering Human Resources in Supporting Leadership Function in Higher Education in the 21st Century. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v6i2.1493
Hussain, N., Adnan, S. M., & Aarbi, M. I. (2022). A Study of Stoning Punishment: A Religious Perspective. Journal of Law & Social Studies, 4(1), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.04.01.178190
Iran: Human Rights in Iran: Review of 2023/2024. (2024).
Kamali, M. Hashim. (2019). Maqāṣid al-Sharīảh made simple (13th ed.). International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Kandedes, I. (2020). Kekerasan Terhadap Anak di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Harkat, 16(1), 1–8.
Kholid, M. (2018). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Undang-Undang Perbankan Syariah. Asy-Syari’ah, 20(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i2.3448
Lavinia Spieß. (2021). Iran’s Use of Punitive Amputations and International Human Rights Law. International Observatory of Human Rights.
Mahfud, M., Tinggi, S., Islam, A., & Gresik, A.-A. (2020). Pemikiran Islam Modern Perspektif Mustafa Kemal. Jurnal.Stai-Alazharmenganti.Ac.Id, 1, 44–55.
Manaf, M. K. S. A. (2023). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL AND MALAYSIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ON THE TREATMENT ON UNCONTROLLABLE CHILDREN: IS THERE ANY INCONSISTENCY? Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no1.346
Mohammadkhani, A. (2023). A Fresh Research on Obstacles to Qisas. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 11(43), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2023.68660.2493
Mudassir, & Gunawan, E. (2017). Karakteristik dan Pendekatan Aspek Sosial Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 15(2), 94–114.
Nur, M. (n.d.). Implementing Islamic Criminal Law: Does it Break the Indonesian Legal System? In International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.ijicc.net (Vol. 12, Issue 6).
Patterson, D. (2024). Human Rights-based Approaches and the Right to Health: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 16(2), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad063
Purnomo, B. (2020). MAQÂSHID AL-SYARÎʻAH AND HUMAN RIGHTS PROBLEMS. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i1.5631
Rafiq, W., Fatima, S., & Bilal, M. (2023). Protection Against Self-Incrimination: An Evaluation of Legal Framework in Pakistan. Global Legal Studies Review, 8(I), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(viii-i).09
Saifuddin, S., Ali Tajuddin, H. H., Yahya, M. A., Abd Rahman, M. R., & Hashim, F. Y. (2024). EXAMINING THE APPLICATION OF STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC LAW AND COMMON LAW IN MALAYSIA. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.491
Shidiq, G. (1970). Teori Maqashid Al-Syari’Ah Dalam Hukum Islam. Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung, 44(118), 117–130.
Sidiq, S. (2017). Maqashid Syariah & Tantangan Modernitas: Sebuah Telaah Pemikiran Jasser Auda. In Right, 7(1), 140–161.
Zakariyah, L. (2012). Islamic Legal Maxims for Attainment of Maqasid-al-Shari‘ah in Criminal Law: Reflections on the Implications for Muslim Women in the Tension Between Shari‘ah and Western Law. In Women in Islam (pp. 117–134). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4219-2_9
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Arafat, Asmuni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





.png)


