Kepastian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria
Reformasi Eksekusi Putusan yang Berkeadilan
Abstract
Agrarian conflicts in Indonesia, particularly those occurring in East Kalimantan, reflect a profound weakness in the system of fair and effective dispute resolution. Although court rulings have obtained permanent legal force—as exemplified by Decision No. 3/Pdt. Eks/2023/PN. Trg—the execution of such rulings still faces significant obstacles. This study aims to identify the causes behind the failure of agrarian dispute executions and to propose a model for more just and effective resolution. Adopting the perspective of Thomas Aquinas’s theory of justice, this research emphasizes three core principles of justice in resolving agrarian disputes: distributive justice, legal justice, and commutative justice. Based on these principles, the article proposes a set of strategic solutions to enhance the effectiveness of agrarian dispute settlements. These include strengthening mediation before execution, reconstructing execution regulations to limit baseless objections, harmonizing land data to prevent overlapping certificates, and applying a social approach to execution that considers the welfare of affected communities. This study is expected to contribute to the reform of agrarian dispute resolution regulations in Indonesia, with the ultimate goal of establishing a more efficient, equitable, and sustainable system.
References
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Amaliyah, A., Ma’ruf, M. A., Sary, N., & Bitu, S. G. (2021). REFORMA AGRARIA DAN PENANGANAN SENGKETA TANAH. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i1.4892
Andra, S., & Lubis, F. (2024). UPAYA HUKUM DERDEN VERZET TERHADAP SITA EKSEKUSI PERSEPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Quantum Juris: Jurnal Hukum Modern, 6(3), 228–245.
Anggita, A. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konflik Kepemilikan Tanah dengan Pendekatan Litigasi di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Savana: Indonesian Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law, 1(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.25134/savana.v1i01.30
Anwar, Y., & Adang, A. (2008). Pengantar Sosiologi Hukum. PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Arifin, M. Z., Nugraha, M., Putri, T. Y., & Ramadhan, M. S. (2024). Membumikan Teori Negara Kesejahteraan Dalam Penguatan Dana Desa Untuk Pengentasan Kemiskinan Menurut Keadilan Distributif. Journal Of Law And Social Society, 1(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.70656/jolasos.v1i2.158
Astriani, B. A., & Indrawati, S. (2024). Sengketa Tanah dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria di Indonesia. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.
Cahyadi, A. (2009). Sosiologi Hukum dalam Perubahan (D. Danardono, Ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Demak, A. A. K. (2020). PENERAPAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI DALAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 8(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/29761
Ginting, Y. P., Mahendi, M. M., Meliala, A., & Naibaho, N. (2023). SOSIALISASI TERKAIT HASIL EKSEKUSI RIIL YANG MELEBIHI BATAS EKSEKUSI TERKAIT SENGKETA TANAH. Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, 2(10), 905–915. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpws.v2i10.676
Iswantoro, I. (2013). Dilematika Sengketa Pertanahan dan Penyelesaiannya dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v2i1.1892
Khair, V. M., & Assyahri, W. (2024). Optimalisasi Administrasi Pertanahan di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Strategi Menuju Kepastian Hukum. Journal of Public Administration and Management Studies, 2(2), 55–62.
Kolopaking, A. D. A. (2013). Asas Itikad Baik dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Melalui Arbitase. Alumni.
Luthfiyah, N., & Marpaung, N. (2023). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 179 K/PDT/G/2013). Notary Journal, 3(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.19166/nj.v3i1.6317
Murtiningsih, V. (2017). Perlawanan pihak ketiga (derden verzet) terhadap penundaan eksekusi (studi kasus putusan nomor: 21/Pdt.Plw/2012/PN.SLMN) [Universitas Sebelas Maret]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/73516/Perlawanan-pihak-ketiga-derden-verzet-terhadap-penundaan-eksekusi-studi-kasus-putusan-nomor-21PdtPlw2012PNSLMN
Musaffah, U., & Maharani, A. J. (2024). Penerapan Teori Hukum dan Masyarakat dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria (Studi Kasus Sengketa Lahan di Lampung Tengah). Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 8(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v8i1.5702
Ningrum, H. R. S. (2014). ANALISIS HUKUM SISTEM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ATAS TANAH BERBASIS KEADILAN. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v1i2.1481
Prasetya, N. H., Zuffran, F., & Murtada, F. S. (2024). Analisis Konflik Agraria di Kalimantan Timur: Studi Kasus Sengketa Lahan Antara Masyarakat Adat dan Perusahaan Tambang. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12636956
Prawira, S. S., & Ilyas, M. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi: Studi Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bantaeng. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 1(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v1i1.23
Safdah, N. (2024). PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH AKIBAT ADANYA TUMPANG TINDIH SERTIFIKAT TANAH (Studi Kasus Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Gresik). Dinamika, 30(1), 9619–9632.
Shibghatillah, S. A., & Santoso, B. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Tanah Oleh Hakim Dalam Putusan No. 73/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Btl. Notarius, 15(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46024
Silviana, A. (2019). Kebijakan Satu Peta (One Map Policy) Mencegah Konflik di Bidang Administrasi Pertanahan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.195-205
Copyright (c) 2025 Dziqry Irga Abisha, Surahman Surahman, Aullia Vivi Yulianingrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
