Sanksi Adat Dayak Mualang dan Jangkang di Kabupaten Sekadau dalam Kaitannya dengan Konsep Residive Dan Asas Ne Bis In Idem

  • Plasma Versiana Mukti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Herlina Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Mega Fitri Hertini Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Yuliana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tanjungpura
Keywords: Dayak Customary Law, Recidivism, Ne Bis in Idem

Abstract

This research examines the sanctions imposed in the customary law system of the Dayak Mualang and Jangkang communities in Sekadau Regency, focusing on their relation to the concepts of recidivism and the principle of Ne Bis in Idem. The background arises from recurring criminal acts such as theft, domestic violence, and violations of public order, which highlight the limitations of customary sanctions in deterring repeat offenses. The study aims to analyze, first, the recognition and application of recidivism within these communities and its impact on repeated offenses; and second, the factors underlying the imposition of double sanctions for a single act in the absence of Ne Bis in Idem. Using an empirical juridical method, data were collected through field research, interviews with customary leaders, and analysis of legal documents. The findings reveal that the customary law of Dayak Mualang and Jangkang does not recognize recidivism, resulting in repeated offenders receiving the same sanctions without aggravation. Moreover, in certain cases, offenders are subjected to double sanctions by different customary authorities, which is viewed socially as moral accountability rather than legal duplication. However, this practice contradicts modern criminal law principles and creates potential violations of human rights due to legal uncertainty. The research concludes that integrating the principles of recidivism and Ne Bis in Idem into customary law is essential to enhance justice, ensure proportional sanctions, and maintain social harmony in multicultural communities.

References

Amajihono, K, D. (2024). Penjatuhan sanksi adat melekat ne bis in idem. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 3(1), 11–23. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan/article/view/1435/1015

Hardani, Nur H. U & Helmina A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Cet Ke-1. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu Group Yogyakarta.

Hartini, Agnesia & Fusnika. (2019). WARISAN KEARIFAN LOKAL DALAM TRADISI NAIK JURONG PADA SUKU DAYAK MUALANG DIKABUPATEN SEKADAU. JURNAL PEKAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 2: 111–20. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpk.v4i2.551.

Hidayat, Aritonang, R. V. D. & Lavea, H. (2024). ANALISIS ASAS NE BIS IN IDEM DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik 1, no. 2: 250–58. https://jurnal.kopusindo.com/index.php/jkhkp/article/view/199/190

Kotu, M. A. (2016). PENERAPAN ASAS NEBIS IN IDEM DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA PIDANA. Lex et Societatis, Vol. 4 No. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v4i2.1.11429

Masril & Ade K. (2019). KEBERLAKUAN ASAS NE BIS IN IDEM TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN ADAT DALAM TATA HUKUM INDONESIA. Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 4, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v4i1.2167.

Montolalu, P. P. (2022). KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG PEMBERATAN PIDANA PADA RECIDIVE. Lex Privatum, Vol. 9 No.11. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/38359

Nurfatlah, T., Abadi, S. H. K., & Efendi, S. (2024). KONSEP RESIDIVE DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL DITINJAU DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN. Unizar Law Review, Volume 7(Issue 1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v7i1.70

Isabela, M. A. C. (2022). Hukum Adat; Pengertian, Sumber, Dan Unsur, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/06/09/03000081/hukum-adat--pengertian-sumber-dan unsur#:~:text, diakses tanggal 18 Juni 2025)

Patuju, L. & Sakticakra, S. A. (2019). RESIDIVIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 1, no. 1:104–14. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v1i1.78

Rachmat, L. I. (2023). SISTEM HUKUM ADAT DAYAK MUALANG BUTANG DALAM KAJIAN ASPEK HUKUM DAN BUDAYA. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 11: 1017–23. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i11.734

Satjipto, R. (2011) HUKUM PROGRESIF: HUKUM YANG MEMBEBASKAN. Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1, https:// doi.org/10.14710/hp.1.1.1-24.

Rozi, F. (2015) PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP RESIDIVIS DALAM PRAKTEK PERADILAN. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, 2015, 1–11. www.unmuhjember.ac.id.

Siregar, F. A. (2018). CIRI HUKUM ADAT DAN KARAKTERISTIKNYA. Jurnal Al-Maqasid 4, no. 2, 1–14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v4i2.1473

Sudarto. (1981). Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Sugandhi. (2004). R. KUHP Dan Penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Sutrisno. (2024) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PADA RESIDIVIST TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli | 7, no. 2, 10–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v7i2.2419

Warassih, E. (2011). Pranata Hukum, Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2021). PEMIKIRAN HUKUM PROGRESIF UNTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT. Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1: 112–37. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1816

Published
2025-10-28

Most read articles by the same author(s)