DINAMIKA KEILMUAN HADIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF AHLI SUNAH DAN SYIAH IMAMIYAH
Abstract
This paper discusses the dynamics of hadith scholarship between Sunnaists and Shia Imamiyah, developing along with criticism and scholarly dialogue on hadith between these two groups so that it is necessary to conduct studies with a focus on the history of scientific formation, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each. The discussion method is in the form of literature review. Data analysis uses content analysis with a historical approach. Primary data is in the form of hadith science books and secondary data from hadith books and others according to the needs of the discussion. The findings of the discussion: Scholars of hadith Expert Sunnah was born from oral culture into writings that are collected in the books of hadith. It is inclusive, oriented towards rawi and matan criticism with the levels of valid, hasan, dha'if and maudhu' so that scientific dialogue is well systemized even though the determination of the authenticity of hadith cannot be separated from the subjectivity of hadith critics. Imamiyya Shia hadith scholarship is under the authority of the imam and is exclusive with the levels of sahih, hasan, muwastaq and dha'if so that scientific dialogue is based on the authority of the imam and the scientific system adopts sunnah experts.
References
Ahlul Bait Indonesia (ABI) & Dewan Pengurus Pusat (DPP). (2012). Buku Putih Mazhab Syiah Menurut Para Ulamanya Yang Muktabar: Penjelasan ringkas, Lengkap Untuk Kerukunan Umat. Dewan Pengurus Pusat, Ahlul Bait Indonesia (ABI).
Ahmad, J. (2017). Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis dalam Pandangan Ahl al-Sunnah dan Syiah. Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1548/quhas.v6i1.13404
Alkadri. (2016). Sistem Periwayatan Hadis dalam Perspektif Syiah Imamiyah dan Ahlus Sunah. Alwatzikhoebillah: Jurnal Kajian Islam, II(4) 1–10.
Ameli, S. R., & Molaei, H. (2012). Religious affiliation and intercultural sensitivity: Interculturality between Shia & Sunni Muslims in Iran. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.007
Azkar, M. (2016). “Hadits” Dalam Perspektif Sunni dan Syiah: Sebuah Perbandingan. Mu’amalat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), Article 1. https://journal.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/muamalat/article/view/1011
Dzahabî. (1998). Tadzkirah al-Huffâzh: Vol. I. Dâr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Fahimah, S. (2018). Epistemologi Hadis Sunni-Syiah: Analisa Terhadap Implikasinya. ALAMTARA: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 2(1), Article 1. http://ejournal.iai-tabah.ac.id/index.php/alamtaraok/article/view/236Helfont, S. (2009). The Muslim Brotherhood and the Emerging ‘Shia Crescent.’ Orbis, 53(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2009.01.005
Kulani, A. (1388). Al-Kâfi. Dâr al-Kutub al-Islamiyah.
Muttaqin, K. (2018). Metode Keṣahīhan Hadis Sunnī Vs Metode Keṣahīhan Hadis Shī’ah. UNIVERSUM, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v11i1.594
Nasir, M. (2014). Kriteria Keshahihan Hadis Perpektif Syiah. IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, 11(2), 19.
Nasution, H. (1986). Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan. Universitas Indonesia.
Shiddieqy, T. M. H. A. (2009). Sejarah & Pengantar Ilmu Hadits (III). PT. Pustaka Riski Putra.
Suhaimi, A.H. (2003). Tautsiq as-Sunnah Baina asy-Syi’ah Imamiyah wa Ahli as-Sunah fi Ahkâmi Imam wa Nikâh Mut’ah (I). Dâr as-Salâm.
Thahhan, M. (1985). Taisîr Musthalah al-Hadîts. Haramain.
.png)
