Learning Culture Through Craft: Social Learning And Cultural Participation Through Miao Embroidery In Guizhou, China
Abstract
This research is motivated by a gap in intangible cultural heritage studies, which still limit their ability to empirically explain how community-based social learning mechanisms maintain cultural participation beyond formal and event-based approaches. The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of social learning, patterns of learning culture and cultural participation, as well as the dominant dimensions that shape community-based cultural practices in Miao embroidery. This study uses a quantitative, cross-sectional design with participants from the Miao embroidery community. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire that measured social learning, learning culture, and cultural participation. Data analysis used descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, to identify dominant patterns and dimensions. The results show that social learning is in the very high category, with practice participation as the most dominant learning mechanism. In contrast, cultural participation is primarily driven by attachment to cultural identity rather than participation in formal cultural events. These findings indicate that the sustainability of community-based culture is determined more by embodied learning processes and identity attachment than external or ceremonial approaches. Therefore, this study recommends that cultural preservation strategies focus on strengthening daily practices in communities, developing collective learning environments, and strengthening cultural identity to ensure the sustainability of traditional crafts.
References
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031935
Adlin, S., & Pookulangara, S. (2018). Cultural symbolism in traditional textiles: A study of Chinese embroidery and its contemporary relevance. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(3), 321–330.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1447400
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, class, distinction. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Chan, T. W. (2010). Social status and cultural consumption. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Y., & Wang, Y.-W. (2024). Approaches to sustaining people–place bonds in conservation planning: From value-based, living heritage, to the glocal community. Built Heritage, 8(1), Article 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00121-8
Du, Y., & Jiang, N. (2024). Exploring innovative models of Guizhou Miao embroidery from a digital perspective. In P.-L. P. Rau (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Cultural Heritage, Creativity and Social Development (pp. 30–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-XXXX-X_3
Guo, J., & Ahn, B. (2023). Tacit knowledge sharing for enhancing the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) crafts: A perspective from artisans and academics under craft–design collaboration. Sustainability, 15(20), 14955.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014955
Keane, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Creative industries in China: Art, design and media. Polity Press.
Kraaykamp, G., & van Eijck, K. (2010). The intergenerational reproduction of cultural capital: A threefold perspective. Social Forces, 89(1), 209–231.
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0087
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Li, H., Xue, T., Zheng, Z., Luo, X., & Huang, G. (2025). The innovation of traditional handicrafts and cultural identity: A multidimensional value analysis using the DEMATEL-ISM method. PLOS ONE, 20(5), e0322893.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322893
Li, X. (2019). Cultural heritage and traditional Chinese embroidery: Identity, symbolism, and transmission. Journal of Asian Culture and History, 11(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5539/jach.v11n2p45
Mudau, T. J., Netshakhuma, N. S., Nethengwe, N. S., & Mushamiri, E. (2024). Preserving cultural heritage: A community-centric approach to safeguarding the Khulubvi Traditional Temple Malawi. Heliyon, 10, e36419.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36419
Nagel, I. (2010). Cultural participation between the ages of 14 and 24: Intergenerational transmission or cultural mobility? European Sociological Review, 26(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp037
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Roose, H., van Eijck, K., & Lievens, J. (2012). Culture of distinction or culture of openness? Using a social space approach to analyze the social structuring of lifestyles. Poetics, 40(6), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2012.08.001
Su, Y. (2018). The transformation of traditional Chinese embroidery in the context of globalization. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 567–582.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877917732995
Van Hek, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Cultural consumption across countries: A multi-level analysis of social inequality in highbrow culture in Europe. Poetics, 41(4), 323–341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.05.001
Wang, Y. (2020). Traditional Chinese embroidery: Cultural meanings and contemporary transformation. Sustainability, 12(18), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187745
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Yaish, M., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2012). Disentangling "cultural capital": The consequences of cultural and economic resources for taste and participation. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq056
Zhang, N., & Smith, A. (2021). Cultural commodification and authenticity in traditional Chinese crafts: A case study of embroidery. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09385-7
Zhang, N., & Sharudin, S. A. (2024). Research on innovative development of Miao embroidery intangible cultural heritage in Guizhou, China, based on digital design. Journal of Business and Economics Review, 9(2), 85–94.




