Konstruksi Pengetahuan dalam Ilmu dan Kebudayaan (Suatu Kajian Epistemologis)
Keywords:
Filsafat ilmu, kebudayaan, pengetahuan.
Abstract
Perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan selalu berhubungan dengan nilai dan praktik budaya yang membentuk cara masyarakat memahami realitas. Karena itu, kajian filsafat ilmu dan kebudayaan diperlukan untuk melihat bagaimana pengetahuan ilmiah lahir, dibenarkan, dan diarahkan dalam konteks sosial tertentu. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan epistemologis antara proses produksi pengetahuan dan konstruksi budaya, serta menjelaskan peran budaya dalam membentuk kerangka berpikir ilmiah dan kriteria kebenaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis berbasis studi kepustakaan. Literatur primer dan sekunder terbitan sepuluh tahun terakhir dalam bidang epistemologi, filsafat budaya, dan sosiologi pengetahuan dianalisis untuk menelusuri pola hubungan antara ilmu dan kebudayaan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kebudayaan tidak hanya menjadi latar tempat ilmu berkembang, tetapi turut mengarahkan cara ilmuwan merumuskan masalah, memilih metode, dan menafsirkan data. Sebaliknya, perkembangan ilmu turut memengaruhi perubahan budaya melalui inovasi dan pembentukan pola pikir baru. Hubungan ini bersifat timbal balik dan saling menentukan. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya memahami ilmu pengetahuan sebagai bagian dari proses kebudayaan, sehingga pengembangannya lebih relevan, etis, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat
References
Ajmani, L. H., Foriest, J. C., Taylor, J., Pittman, K., Gilbert, S., & Devito, M. A. (2024). Whose Knowledge is Valued?: Epistemic Injustice in CSCW Applications. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(CSCW2). https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2025a). Imagining Technology-Mediated Social Change? A Critique of the Theory of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Minerva 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11024-025-09622-X
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2025b). Imagining Technology-Mediated Social Change? A Critique of the Theory of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Minerva 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11024-025-09622-X
Barrocas Ferreira, B., & Borges, M. M. (2022). The Epistemic Cultures of the Digital Humanities and Their Relation to Open Science: Contributions to the Open Humanities Discourse. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2022/4/2/11388
Bhakuni, H., & Abimbola, S. (2021). Epistemic injustice in academic global health. The Lancet. Global Health, 9(10), e1465–e1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6
Cai, H. (2025). The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 2025 9:1, 9(1), 12-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41257-025-00135-9
Cho, S., & Hayter, C. S. (2021). Erratum to: Under pressure: A systematic review of stress and its impact among graduate students. Science and Public Policy, 47(6), 893–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCAB015
Del Santo, F. (2023). Between understanding and control: Science as a cultural product. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09960-1
Fagan, M. B. (2010). Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice. Philosophy of Science, 77(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/650210
Gandolfi, H. E. (2024). (Re)considering Nature of Science Education in the Face of Socio-scientific Challenges and Injustices. Science & Education 2024 34:6, 34(6), 3799–3825. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-024-00536-W
García-Moriyón, F., González-Lamas, J., Botella, J., Vela, J. G., Miranda-Alonso, T., Palacios, A., & Robles-Loro, R. (2020). Research in moral education: The contribution of P4C to the moral growth of students. Education Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10040119
Gatt, C. (2023). Decolonizing scholarship? Plural onto/epistemologies and the right to science. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1297747
Haqiah, N. A., Nurhamidah, W. I., Rahma, A. F., Sa’adah, R., & Usman. (2025). Revolusi Paradigma sebagai Landasan Epistemologi Ilmu: Telaah Filsafat Ilmu atas Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn. JURNAL ILMIAH FALSAFAH: Jurnal Kajian Filsafat, Teologi Dan Humaniora, 11(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.37567/JIF.V11I2.4558
Helm, P., Bella, G., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2023). Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injustice. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.13714
Hilligardt, H. (2022). Looking beyond values: The legitimacy of social perspectives, opinions and interests in science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2022 12:4, 12(4), 58-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13194-022-00490-W
Hypatia - Wiley Online Library. (n.d.). Retrieved December 21, 2025, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15272001
Intemann, K. (2024). Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication. Synthese 2024 203:2, 203(2), 42-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-023-04471-1
Izquierdo-Acebes, E., & García-Carmona, A. (2025). Discussing Science Values and Norms from a Learning Situation Historically Contextualised in Mendel’s Laws and Guided by Scientific Practices. Science & Education 2025, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-025-00627-2
Kirschke, S., Glahe, J., & Kirschke, D. (2025). Exploring impacts of participatory science communication on science, politics, and society. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1566429. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMM.2025.1566429/BIBTEX
Knöchelmann, M. (2021). The democratisation myth: Open access and the solidification of epistemic injustices. Science and Technology Studies, 34(2), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.23987/STS.94964
Laux, H., Matthäus, S., Wieghorst, C., & Zeltner, P. (2025). Techno-Fixes: On the Non-Disruptive Disruptions of Cultured Meat, Social Freezing and AI Assistants. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251395213
Legate, A., Nimon, K., & Noblin, A. (2024). (Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review. F1000Research, 13. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.151493.2/DOI
Ludwig, D., & Poliseli, L. (2018). Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures. Biology and Philosophy, 33(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10539-018-9655-X
Massimi, M. (2025). Local knowledges and the right to participate in science. Philosophy of Science, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/PSA.2025.4
Räisä, T., & Stocchetti, M. (2024). Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33621/JDSR.V6I3.33235
Ratti, E., & Russo, F. (2024). Science and values: a two-way direction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2024 14:1, 14(1), 6-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13194-024-00567-8
Santana, C. (2024). The Value of Openness in Open Science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 54(4), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/CAN.2024.44
Scoping Review THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF OPEN SCIENCE TO RESEARCH CULTURE. (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379695
Sithole, A. (2025). Choosing a Qualitative Research Paradigm for Social Sciences: A Literature Review for Educational Researchers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 3945–3954. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120327
Stamenkovic, P., Hansson, S. O., & Betz, G. (2024). Straightening the ‘value-laden turn’: minimising the influence of extra-scientific values in science. Synthese 2024 203:1, 203(1), 20-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-023-04446-2
Technology in Society | Journal | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier. (n.d.). Retrieved December 21, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/technology-in-society
Tsapos, M. (2025). What Is Interesting About Conspiracy Theories? Social Epistemology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2566131
van Leersum, C. M., Jaschinski, C., Bults, M., & van der Zwart, J. (2024). Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems 2024 22:1, 22(1), 119-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-024-01152-4
van Noord, N., Wevers, M., Blanke, T., Noordegraaf, J., & Worring, M. (2022). An Analytics of Culture: Modeling Subjectivity, Scalability, Contextuality, and Temporality. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.139
Ward, Z. B. (2021). On value-laden science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHPSA.2020.09.006
Weaver, K. (2023). Bridging Indigenous and Western knowledge-systems in knowledge co-production with Amazonian Indigenous communities: a systematic realist review. Development Studies Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2203842;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2022). Epistemic pluralism and the justification of conceptual strategies in science. Theory and Psychology, 32(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211063827;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:TAPA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2025a). Imagining Technology-Mediated Social Change? A Critique of the Theory of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Minerva 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11024-025-09622-X
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2025b). Imagining Technology-Mediated Social Change? A Critique of the Theory of Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Minerva 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11024-025-09622-X
Barrocas Ferreira, B., & Borges, M. M. (2022). The Epistemic Cultures of the Digital Humanities and Their Relation to Open Science: Contributions to the Open Humanities Discourse. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2022/4/2/11388
Bhakuni, H., & Abimbola, S. (2021). Epistemic injustice in academic global health. The Lancet. Global Health, 9(10), e1465–e1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6
Cai, H. (2025). The epistemology of contemporary social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 2025 9:1, 9(1), 12-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41257-025-00135-9
Cho, S., & Hayter, C. S. (2021). Erratum to: Under pressure: A systematic review of stress and its impact among graduate students. Science and Public Policy, 47(6), 893–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCAB015
Del Santo, F. (2023). Between understanding and control: Science as a cultural product. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09960-1
Fagan, M. B. (2010). Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice. Philosophy of Science, 77(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/650210
Gandolfi, H. E. (2024). (Re)considering Nature of Science Education in the Face of Socio-scientific Challenges and Injustices. Science & Education 2024 34:6, 34(6), 3799–3825. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-024-00536-W
García-Moriyón, F., González-Lamas, J., Botella, J., Vela, J. G., Miranda-Alonso, T., Palacios, A., & Robles-Loro, R. (2020). Research in moral education: The contribution of P4C to the moral growth of students. Education Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10040119
Gatt, C. (2023). Decolonizing scholarship? Plural onto/epistemologies and the right to science. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1297747
Haqiah, N. A., Nurhamidah, W. I., Rahma, A. F., Sa’adah, R., & Usman. (2025). Revolusi Paradigma sebagai Landasan Epistemologi Ilmu: Telaah Filsafat Ilmu atas Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn. JURNAL ILMIAH FALSAFAH: Jurnal Kajian Filsafat, Teologi Dan Humaniora, 11(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.37567/JIF.V11I2.4558
Helm, P., Bella, G., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2023). Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injustice. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.13714
Hilligardt, H. (2022). Looking beyond values: The legitimacy of social perspectives, opinions and interests in science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2022 12:4, 12(4), 58-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13194-022-00490-W
Hypatia - Wiley Online Library. (n.d.). Retrieved December 21, 2025, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15272001
Intemann, K. (2024). Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication. Synthese 2024 203:2, 203(2), 42-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-023-04471-1
Izquierdo-Acebes, E., & García-Carmona, A. (2025). Discussing Science Values and Norms from a Learning Situation Historically Contextualised in Mendel’s Laws and Guided by Scientific Practices. Science & Education 2025, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-025-00627-2
Kirschke, S., Glahe, J., & Kirschke, D. (2025). Exploring impacts of participatory science communication on science, politics, and society. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1566429. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCOMM.2025.1566429/BIBTEX
Knöchelmann, M. (2021). The democratisation myth: Open access and the solidification of epistemic injustices. Science and Technology Studies, 34(2), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.23987/STS.94964
Laux, H., Matthäus, S., Wieghorst, C., & Zeltner, P. (2025). Techno-Fixes: On the Non-Disruptive Disruptions of Cultured Meat, Social Freezing and AI Assistants. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251395213
Legate, A., Nimon, K., & Noblin, A. (2024). (Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review. F1000Research, 13. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.151493.2/DOI
Ludwig, D., & Poliseli, L. (2018). Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures. Biology and Philosophy, 33(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10539-018-9655-X
Massimi, M. (2025). Local knowledges and the right to participate in science. Philosophy of Science, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/PSA.2025.4
Räisä, T., & Stocchetti, M. (2024). Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33621/JDSR.V6I3.33235
Ratti, E., & Russo, F. (2024). Science and values: a two-way direction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2024 14:1, 14(1), 6-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13194-024-00567-8
Santana, C. (2024). The Value of Openness in Open Science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 54(4), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/CAN.2024.44
Scoping Review THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF OPEN SCIENCE TO RESEARCH CULTURE. (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379695
Sithole, A. (2025). Choosing a Qualitative Research Paradigm for Social Sciences: A Literature Review for Educational Researchers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 3945–3954. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120327
Stamenkovic, P., Hansson, S. O., & Betz, G. (2024). Straightening the ‘value-laden turn’: minimising the influence of extra-scientific values in science. Synthese 2024 203:1, 203(1), 20-. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-023-04446-2
Technology in Society | Journal | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier. (n.d.). Retrieved December 21, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/technology-in-society
Tsapos, M. (2025). What Is Interesting About Conspiracy Theories? Social Epistemology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2566131
van Leersum, C. M., Jaschinski, C., Bults, M., & van der Zwart, J. (2024). Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems 2024 22:1, 22(1), 119-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12961-024-01152-4
van Noord, N., Wevers, M., Blanke, T., Noordegraaf, J., & Worring, M. (2022). An Analytics of Culture: Modeling Subjectivity, Scalability, Contextuality, and Temporality. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.139
Ward, Z. B. (2021). On value-laden science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SHPSA.2020.09.006
Weaver, K. (2023). Bridging Indigenous and Western knowledge-systems in knowledge co-production with Amazonian Indigenous communities: a systematic realist review. Development Studies Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2023.2203842;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2022). Epistemic pluralism and the justification of conceptual strategies in science. Theory and Psychology, 32(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211063827;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:TAPA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Published
2026-10-06
How to Cite
Ineke Hanny Rahmawati, Ach. Farhan Nur Hidayat, Rifqi Delvian Naufal, Wanda Febrian Triyansyah, & Carsiwan. (2026). Konstruksi Pengetahuan dalam Ilmu dan Kebudayaan (Suatu Kajian Epistemologis). JURNAL ILMIAH FALSAFAH: Jurnal Kajian Filsafat, Teologi Dan Humaniora, 12(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.37567/jif.v12i2.4813
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2026 INEKE RAHMAWATI, Ach. Farhan Nur Hidayat, Rifqi Delvian Naufal, Wanda Febrian Triyansyah, Carsiwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
