KRITIK SANAD DAN MATAN DALAM PENENTUAN KESAHIHAN HADIS
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of the sanad criticism and matan criticism methods in determining the authenticity of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. This study is motivated by the fact that the narration of hadith involves humans as intermediaries so that there is the potential for errors in the transmission of the narrations. The research method used is qualitative research with a library research approach, which examines classical and contemporary literature in the field of Hadith science, especially works that discuss the methodology of sanad criticism, matan criticism, and Hadith takhrij. Data were analyzed using descriptive-analytical techniques by examining the concepts, principles, and steps of implementing Hadith criticism in the Islamic scientific tradition. The results of the study indicate that sanad criticism and matan criticism are two complementary methods and cannot be separated in the process of assessing hadith. Sanad criticism is applied through an assessment of the credibility and continuity of the narration, while matan criticism is used to test the validity of the substance of the hadith and its conformity with the Qur'an, other narrations, historical facts and rational principles, sharia principles, and common sense. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach in the study of hadith so that the assessment of the Prophet's history is not partial while, at the same time, strengthening the legitimacy of the classical methodology of hadith science in facing contemporary academic challenges and criticism.
References
Agustiani, Y., & Ratnasih, T. (2022). Kualitas dan Interpretasi Hadis tentang Misogini: Studi Takhrij dan Syarah. Jurnal Riset Agama, 2(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v2i2.18057
Almunawir, N. (2021). Larangan Begadang sebagai Pemeliharaan Imunitas Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Riset Agama, 1(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v1i1.14258
Anshori, M. (2016). KAJIAN KETERSAMBUNGAN SANAD (ITTIŞĀL AL-SANAD). Jurnal Living Hadis, 1(2), 294–324. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2016.1123
Ansor, M., Arrauf, I. F., & Amri, Y. (2016). Under the Shadow of Sharia: Christian Muslim Relations from Acehnese Christian Experience. Komunitas, 8(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v8i1.4966
Armita, P., & Arni, J. (2017). DINAMIKA PEMAHAMAN ULAMA TENTANG HADIS DAJJAL (Dari Interpretasi Tekstual Ke Interpretasi Kontekstual). Jurnal Ushuluddin, 25(2), 208. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v25i2.2398
Ayub, A. (2018). Matn Criticism and its Role in The Evaluation of Hadith Authenticity. IJISH (International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities), 1(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v1i1.136
Dani, A. (2018). Hadith Selection Methods in the Study of Sirah Nabawiyyah (An Analysis of Shahih Sirah Nabawiyyah by Akram Dhiya al-‘Umari). International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 5(2), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v5i2.1741
Derajat, A. Z. (2021). Criticism of Sanad and Matan Perspective of Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail in Understanding the Hadith of Fasting Sunnah Rajab. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i2.2376
Derlan, A. M., & Askar. (2024). METODE TAKHRIJ HADIST DALAM MENAKAR KUALITAS HADIST NABI. KAMALIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.69698/jpai.v2i2.626
Fata, Z., & Khoerudin, F. (2020). Tradisi Kritik Sebagai Indikator Autentisitas Hadis Nabi. Dialogia, 18(2), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v18i2.2437
Fikri, I. F. (2019). Takhrij dan Fahm al Hads "Khuffat al Jannah bi al Makaarih” dalam Kitab Adab al-’Aalim wa al Muta’allim. Jurnal Living Hadis, 4(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2019.1651
Fikri, S., Sholihah, F., Hayyu, J. M., Adlantama, A., & Ali, M. H. (2024). Memahami Makna dari Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis Menurut Pandangan Muhadditsin dan Ushuliyyin. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/pjpi.v1i4.637
Firdaus, F. (2020). PENELITIAN PERSAMBUNGAN SANAD HADIS. Jurnal Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam & Pendidikan, 7(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-qalam.v7i1.179
Firdaus, M. T., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2020). INTEGRASI KEILMUAN DALAM KRITIK MATAN HADIS. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 18(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v18i2.96
Hanifa, M. S., Masrur, A., & Khaeruman, B. (2022). Kriteria Kesahihan Hadis Menurut Nashiruddin Albani dan Ahmad Al-Ghumari. Jurnal Riset Agama, 2(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v2i2.17013
Hardivizon, H. (2017). Metode Pembelajaran Rasulullah SAW (Telaah Kualitas Dan Makna Hadis). BELAJEA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.29240/bjpi.v2i2.287
Huda, N., & Pahrudin, A. (2018). Orientasi Kajian Hadis Kontemporer Indonesia (Studi Artikel E-Jurnal Dalam Portal Moraref 2015-2017). Refleksi, 17(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v17i2.10204
Hudaya, H. (2016). TAKHRIJ AL-HADITS TENTANG PERALATAN MAKAN NABI SAW. Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 15(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v15i2.842
Imtyas, R. (2020). METODE KRITIK SANAD DAN MATAN. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v1i1.15286
Irfan, M. (2022). Kaidah Kesahihan Hadis dan Penerapannya dalam Penelitian Hadis. ANWARUL, 2(6), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.58578/anwarul.v2i6.1276
Ismail, T. M. S. T., Baru, R., Hassan, A. F., Salleh, A. Z. B., & Amin, M. F. M. (2014). The Matan and Sanad Criticisms in Evaluating the Hadith. Asian Social Science, 10(21), p152. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n21p152
Jaya, C. K. (2018). Kritik Terhadap Pemahaman Yang Menyatakan Bahwa Kepemimpinan Islam Harus Berasal Dari Bani Quraisy. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya, 2(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v2i2.3101
Khon, A. M. (2017). PAHAM INGKAR SUNAH DI INDONESIA (STUDI TENTANG PEMIKIRANNYA). Jurnal Theologia, 23(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2012.23.1.1759
Lutfi, A. (2020). KESETARAAN POSISI SUAMI DAN ISTRI DI RUANG PUBLIK DAN DOMESTIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HADIS. Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran Dan al-Hadis, 8(02), 195. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v8i02.7067
Miskaya, R., Ahmad, N. S., Sumbulah, U., & Toriquddin, Moh. (2021). KAJIAN HADIS PERSPEKTIF SUNI DAN SYIAH: Historisitas, Kehujahan Hadis, Parameter Kesahihan Hadis dan Keadilan. Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, 3(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v3i1.9010
Muhyidin, M., & Nashihin, N. (2025). Methodology of Hadith Research Critical Study of the Tradition of Criticism of Sanad and Matan Hadith. Darajatuna: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.55352/darajatuna.v1i1.1671
Munawir, M. F. (2011). REINTREPERTRASI PEMAKNAAN HADIS TENTANG I’TIKAf PEREMPUAN. Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2011.101.33-70
Mushlihati, M., & Hudaya, H. (2022). Kelembutan dalam Rumah Tangga sebagai Tanda Kebaikan: Studi Takhrij Hadis dan Pemaknaan dengan Pendekatan Psikologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 21(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v21i2.7596
Musyafiq, A. (2020). Coherence Method in Matan Criticism. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 20(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v20i1.1741
Muttaqin, N., Budianto, L., Najmi, N., Dian Sari, E., Handoyo, E., & Safiq Mughni, A. (2023). SANAD AND MATAN CRITICISM IN THE FRAMEWORK OF HADITH STUDIES. JIEBAR: Journal of Islamic Education: Basic and Applied Research, 4(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.33853/jiebar.v4i1.531
Muzakkir, M. (2015). KEUTAMAAN BELAJAR DAN MENGAJARKAN AL-QUR’AN: Metode Maudhu’i dalam Perspektif Hadis. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 18(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2015v18n1a9
Najla, Z. (2021). Keutamaan Air Wudu sebagai Kecantikan Wajah: Studi Takhrij dan Syarah Hadis. Jurnal Riset Agama, 1(2), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.15575/jra.v1i2.14763
Rahman, M. S. (2016). KAJIAN MATAN DAN SANAD HADITS DALAM METODE HISTORIS. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v8i2.15
Rifa’i, M., Aziz, M. A., & Fatah, F. R. (2021). Studi Komparasi Manhaj Al-Syaukani (Fawaid al-Majmu’ah Fi Al Ahadis al-Maudu’ah) dan al-Idlibi (Naqd al-Matn; ‘Inda ‘Ulama al-Hadis an-Nabawi). Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v7i1.2900
Rohman, A., Sahidin, A., Al Manaanu, Y., & Nasiruddin, M. (2021). PROBLEM OTENTITAS HADITS (Kritik Musthafa Azami terhadap Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher). Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v7i1.3008
Rosyid, M. N. (2022). AMSAL DALAM KITAB SHAHIH BUKHORI: Study Analisis Dalam Kitab Shahih Bukhori Nomer Hadis: 5534. Ushuly: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.52431/ushuly.v1i1.502
Satria, O. (2020). Interpretasi Sufistik Hadis (Telaah Pemikiran Jalaluddin Rumi dalam Kitab Fihi Mā Fihi). Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab Dan Dakwah, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.32939/ishlah.v1i1.26
Shafwan, M. H. (2023). PENDIDIKAN LITERASI DALAM KITAB HADITS SHAHIH MUSLIM. Studia Religia : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.30651/sr.v7i2.20604
Solihin, S. (2018). Penelitian Hadis: Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi. Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 1(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v1i1.2054
Suryadi, S. (2015). Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad dan Matan dalam Studi Hadis. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 16(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i2.996
Suwarno, R. W. (2018). Kesejarahan Hadis dalam Tinjauan Teori Common Link. Jurnal Living Hadis, 3(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2018.1436
Syamsuddin, S. (2014). KAIDAH KEMUTTASILAN SANAD HADIS (Studi Kritis Terhadap Pendapat Syuhudi Ismail). Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 15(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1501-05
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal SAMBAS (Studi Agama, Masyarakat, Budaya, Adat, Sejarah): Journal of Religious, Community, Culture, Custome, History Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
