Cross -border journal is peer-reviewed, published by the Institute for Research and Service Society Institute of Islamic Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in our journal, including authors, editors, peer-reviewers, and publishers. This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publications
Publication of articles in the Cross -border is an essential building block in developing a coherent network of knowledge and respect. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior that are expected for all parties involved in publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.
Institute for Research and Service Society Institute Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas as the publisher of this journal, is very serious in keeping all stages of publishing, and we are aware of ethical responsibility and our responsibility to others. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Institute for Research and Service Society Institute of Islamic Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas and the Editorial Board will help communicate with the journal and another publisher if it is valuable and necessary.
The Editor of Cross -border is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal are to be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. The Editor can be guided by the policy of the board of editors of the journal and constrained by the requirements of the law, which will apply related to pollution of the name either, breach the rights of copyright, and plagiarism. The Editor may confer with the editors or reviewers else to decide on this.
An editor evaluates manuscripts at all times for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.
Editors and staff editorial are not allowed to disclose information about what sort of script that is sent to anyone else other than the authors are concerned, reviewers, prospective reviewers, advisers other editorial and publishers, as it should be.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Material that is not published are disclosed in the manuscript that was sent was not allowed to be used in the research editor itself without the consent in writing of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.
Each umpire selected who feel not satisfy the requirements for reviewing research that was reported in a manuscript or knows that a review as soon not possibly be done, should give out the Editor and resigned themselves from the process of the review.
Each manuscript was accepted for review must be treated as a document confidential. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the Editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Review should be conducted in an objective. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express a view them with clear with arguments supporting.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify the work of relevant were published which have not been cited by the author. Every statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been reported previously to be accompanied by a quote that is relevant. Reviewers also have to ask for the attention of the Editor every similarity substantial or overlap overlap between the manuscript that is being considered and papers of other published that they know are private.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information or ideas privileged were obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not be used to gain personal. Reviewers are not allowed to consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest that resulted from competitive, collaborative, or relationships or connections other with the author, company, or institution where else associated with the paper.
Duties of Authors
The author reports the study original must present the reports were accurate about the work that is done and the discussion objective about its significance. The data underlying must be represented as accurately in the paper. A paper must contain the details and references are sufficient to enable others to replicate the work of the statements that deceive or are intentionally not accurate is a behavior that is not ethical and not be accepted.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the data raw in connection with the paper for review editorial, and should be prepared to provide access to the public to the data of the (consistent with statements ALPSP-STM on Data and Database), if allowed, and must be in a state of anything else. be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written entirely the work of the original, and if the authors have used the work and / or words of others, then this has been cited or quoted by right.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publications
A writer is not allowed in general publish manuscripts that describe research that is essentially the same in more than one journal or publication primary. Send a text which equal to more than one journal is simultaneously the behavior of the publication that is not ethical and not be accepted.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Recognition of the right over the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported study. All the people who have been giving contributed significantly to be listed as co- authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or listed as contributors. Authors of correspondence should ensure that all co-authors are appropriate and do not exist co-author who does not deserve included in the papers, and that all co-authors have been viewed and approved version of the final papers and has approved the submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves materials, chemicals, procedures, or equipment which has the danger is not unusual that is inherent in its use, the authors should be the clearly identify it in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When a writer find errors or inaccuracies are significant in his work were published, is the obligation of the author to immediately give out the Editor of the journal or publisher, and work together with the Editor to pull back or fix the paper.