KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL CAMAT DI KANTOR KECAMATAN SUNGAI TABUKAN KABUPATEN HULU SUNGAI UTARA
Abstract
This research started from the writer's curiosity about the transformational leadership of the sub-district head at the Sungai Tabukan District Office, Hulu Sungai Utara Regency. The approach used is quantitative research methods collected through the distribution of previously prepared questionnaires. This type of research is explanatory research and aims to provide an explanation of why something happens or answer the question "why". The results of this study indicate that 1) the factor of openness to experience (X1) on transformational leadership (Y) the Camat at the Sungai Tabukan District Office has a positive and significant influence. 2) Conscientiousness factor (X2) on transformational leadership (Y) The sub-district head at Sungai Tabukan sub-district office has a positive and significant influence. 3) The Agreeablenes factor (X3) on transformational leadership (Y) the Camat at the Sungai Tabukan Subdistrict Office has a positive and significant influence. 4) The factor of emotional intelligence (X4) on transformational leadership (Y) The Camat at the Sungai Tabukan District Office has a positive and significant influence. 5) The motivational factor (X5) on transformational leadership (Y) the Camat at the Sungai Tabukan District Office has a positive and significant influence. 6) The decision-making factor (X6) on transformational leadership (Y) the Camat at the Sungai Tabukan District Office has a positive and significant influence. 7) The factors of openness to experience, conscientiousness, agreeableness, emotional intelligence, motivation, and decision making together have a significant effect on transformational leadership, this can be proven by the F-test results obtained that the F-count is 23,286 greater than the F table 2,016 at the level of sig. 0.00.
References
Avolio, BJ., B.M. Bass, D.I Jung. 1999. “Re-Examting the Componrnts of Transformastonal and Transactional Leadrership Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnare”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
B. Parker Ellen III, 2018, Transformational Leadership. D’ Amore - McKim School of Business Northeastern Unversity, Boston, MA, USA. 5990
Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. 2006. “Stakeholders: Theory and Practice”, Oxford University Press.
Gomes, A Rui. 2012. Transformasional Leadership: Theory, Research, And Application To Sport. University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar.
Helmawati. 2014. Meningkatkan Kinerja Kepala Sekolah melalui Manajerial Skills, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Henry, Nicholas. 1995. Public Administration and Public Affairs (Sixth Edition). New Jersey: Practise-Hall.
Holmes J. 1993. John Bowlby & Attachment Theory. Makers of Modem psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Jarkasih, Aceng, 2013. Pelaksanaan Kepemimpinan Transformasional Camat dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Camat Argapura Kabupaten Majalengka. Cendikia. Jurnal Administrasi Negara. Vol. VI No. 1.
Mora, Cristina and Ticlau, 2012. Transformasional Leadership in The Public Sector. A Pilot Study Using MLQ To Evalute Leadership Style in Cluj Country Local Authorities’. Revista de cerceture intervenie social, vol. 36.
Norkolis, 2003 Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Teori, Model, dan Aplikasi, Grasindo.
Popper, M., Mayseless, O., & Castelnovo, O. (2000). Transformational leadership and attachment. The Leadership Quarterly, 11 (2).
Ruben Brent D dan Lea P Stewart. 2006. Communication and Human Behavior. United States: Allyn and Bacon.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Triantoro, Safaria. 2004. Kepemimpinan. Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Victoria, Neufeldt. 1984. Webster’s New World Dictonary, New York: Websters New World Clevnland.
Copyright (c) 2021 M. Ridha Anshari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
