Artificial Intelligence-Based Teacher Training in the Context of Coastal Schools: Evaluation Using the Kirkpatrick Model

  • Kamsuri Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Dody Irawan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Encik Abdulhajar Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Tety Kurmalasari Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Zaitun Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
  • Nevrita Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, Kepualauan Riau, Indonesia
Keywords: AI, Pengembangan Profesional Guru; Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick; Materi Pembelajaran Digital; Konteks Sekolah Pesisir

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) provides new opportunities for improving teachers' professional competencies, particularly in the development of digital learning tools. However, the implementation of AI-based training in coastal schools still faces obstacles, mainly related to infrastructure limitations and digital literacy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Teacher Capacity Building Programme in the Use of AI for the development of learning tools at SMA Negeri 2 Bintan Pesisir, Riau Islands Province. The evaluation was conducted using Kirkpatrick's four-level model, which includes reaction, learning, behaviour, and results. This study used a mixed methods approach with data collection through questionnaires, pretest–posttest tests, and observation. The results showed that the training programme obtained an overall average score of 84.3, which is in the good to very good category. Specifically, the participants' reaction level scored 86.8, learning level 84.4, behavioural change 80.3, and final results 85.7. Correlation analysis between levels showed a coefficient of 0.87, indicating a strong linear relationship between evaluation components. These findings indicate that AI-based training contributes positively to improving teachers' ability to design digital learning tools, although its implementation is still influenced by contextual factors in schools. Theoretically, this study reinforces the relevance of the Kirkpatrick model in evaluating digital training. Practically, the results of this study can be used as a reference in designing technology-based teacher training programmes, especially in coastal areas and regions with digital limitations.

References

Anisah, A. S., Maspirah, & Putri, M. J. (2025). Rethinking Teacher Professional Development for the Digital Era: A Narrative Review. Eduscape: Journal of Education Insight, 3(4), 204–217.
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., & Baldwin, T. T. (2022). Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management, 48(4), 987–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211047557
Boateng, G. O., & Neilands, T. B. (2024). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Educational Research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12509
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective Teacher Professional Development.
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2021). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 10(1), 7–11.
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2021). Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820988594
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promise and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 2401–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10124-9
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2021). Four Levels of Training Evaluation. ATD Press.
Napitupulu, M. H., Muddin, A., Bagiya, B., Diana, S., & Rosyidah, N. S. (2025). Teacher Professional Development in the Digital Age: Strategies for Integrating Technology and Pedagogy. International Journal for Science Review, 2(10).
OECD. (2025). Preparing Teachers for Digital Education.
Shi, Y. R., Sin, K. F. K., & Wang, Y. Q. (2025). Teacher professional development of digital pedagogy for inclusive education in post-pandemic era. Teaching and Teacher Education, 168, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105230
Taherdoost, H. (2021). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
UNESCO. (2023). Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms?
Yulaikhah, S., Suhendra, R. R., & Hidayat, N. (2026). Systematic Literature Review of Barriers to Teachers’ Professional and Digital Competence in Developing Contexts (2020–2025). Journal of Informatic, Education and Management, 8(1), 540–552.
Published
2026-02-23
Section
Articles