Nilai Keadilan Sebagai Landasan Pembuktian dalam KUHAP Nasional
Abstract
This study examines the concept of justice as the foundation of proof in the indonesian criminal procedure code (KUHAP) with a focus on the paradigm shift from procedural justice to substantive justice. Proof is understood not merely as a technical mechanism to fulfill formal evidentiary requirements but as an ethical and constitutional process that determines the realization of justice in criminal adjudication. Using a normative legal research approach combined with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical analyses, this study finds that the new kuhap, enacted under law no. 20 of 2025, affirms the principles of substantive justice through the recognition of electronic evidence, an open system of evidence, and the exclusionary rule for unlawfully obtained evidence. However, the implementation of substantive justice still faces cultural and structural challenges within judicial practice. Therefore, the internalization of substantive justice is essential to ensure that the system of proof not only guarantees legal certainty but also embodies justice that is humane and civilized.
References
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Kencana.
Arief, B. N. (2019). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kebijakan. Kencana.
Ashworth, A. (2015). The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study. Oxford University Press.
Ave, R. M. (2025, November 25). Formula Radbruch dan Dialektika Filsafat Hukum. Formula Radbruch Dan Dialektika Filsafat Hukum. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/formula-radbruch-dan-dialektika-filsafat-hukum-0BW
Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Ibrahim, J. (2018). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.
Indonesia, P. P. (2025). UU No. 20 Tahun 2025 Tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Database Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia - [PERATURAN.GO.ID]. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uu-no-20-tahun-2025
Makarim, E. (2020). Pengantar hukum telematika: Suatu kompilasi kajian. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Group.
Mertokusumo, S. (2017). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Liberty.
Mulyadi, L. (2010). Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori, Praktik, Teknik Penyusunan dan Permasalahannya. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mulyadi, L. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoretis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Alumn.
Nabilla, A., & Triadi, I. (2025). Filsafat Hukum sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Norma dan Prinsip Hukum. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17639976
Quratuainniza, H. S., Sahwahita, P. N., Paramesti, N. Z., Azzahra, E. A., & Triadi, I. (2026). Keadilan sebagai Basis Moral Hukum: Analisis Filsafat dan Relevansinya bagi Sistem Hukum Indonesia | ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora. https://ejurnalqarnain.stisnq.ac.id/index.php/ALADALAH/article/view/1695
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. Alumni.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice: Original Edition. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v
Romli Atmasasmita. (2018). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Kencana.
Sidharta, B. A. (2016). Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Mandar Maju.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Wiradipradja, E. S. (2015). Penuntun Praktis Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Hukum (2nd ed.). CV Keni Media.
Copyright (c) 2026 Tutut Hartati, Edi Saputra Hasibuan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















