Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Tindakan Aparat dalam Penanganan Unjuk Rasa Berdasarkan Konsep Command Responsibility di Indonesia

  • Era Permatasari Universitas jambi
  • Hafrida Universitas Jambi
  • Erwin Universitas Jambi
Keywords: Criminal liability, law enforcement officers, public demonstrations, command responsibility, human rights

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of law enforcement officers in handling public demonstrations based on the concept of command responsibility in Indonesia. Public demonstrations are constitutional rights guaranteed by laws and regulations. However, in practice, there are still actions by law enforcement officers that potentially violate the law and human rights during the security and dispersal of demonstrations. The main issue of this research is how criminal liability is regulated and how the concept of command responsibility can be applied to superiors who knew or should have known about violations committed by their subordinates. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that criminal liability may be imposed not only on direct perpetrators but also on commanding officers who had authority and control, provided that they knew or should have known about the violations and failed to take necessary measures to prevent or punish such acts. Therefore, the concept of command responsibility serves as an important mechanism for ensuring accountability among law enforcement officers and protecting human rights in the handling of public demonstrations in Indonesia.

References

DataBase Peraturan. (1998). UU No. 9 Tahun 1998. Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45478/uu-no-9-tahun-1998

Komisi Untuk Orang Hilang dan Korban Tindak Kekerasan (Director). (2024). , Brutalitas Aparat Bentuk Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan. [Video recording]. https://kontras.org/media/siaranpers/brutalitas-aparat-bentuk-kejahatan-terhadap-kemanusiaan.

Media, K. C. (2025, August 29). Kronologi Ojol Tewas Dilindas Rantis Brimob, Korban Sempat Antar Makanan. KOMPAS.com. https://www.kompas.com/

Muladi, P. D. (2023). STATUTA ROMA TAHUN 1998 TENTANG MAHKAMAH PIDANA INTERNASIONAL(Dalam Kerangka Hukum Pidana Internasional & Implikasinya Terhadap Hukum Pidana Nasional). Penerbit Alumni.

Nasution, L. (2020). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital. BULETIN ADALAH, 4(3), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200

Peraturan Perundang-undangan. (2000). UU No. 26 Tahun 2000. Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/44993/uu-no-26-tahun-2000

Siaran Pers. (2026, June 18). Darurat Pelanggaran dan Kekerasan Aparat dalam Aksi Demonstrasi. YLBHI. https://ylbhi.or.id/informasi/siaran-pers/darurat-pelanggaran-dan-kekerasan-aparat-dalam-aksi-demonstrasi/

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id

Sudirman M., S. (2019). ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN WANPRESTASI AKAD PRODUK MURABAHAH PADA PT. BANK SYARIAH MANDIRI (BSM) KANTOR CABANG KENDARI [Masters, IAN KENDARI]. https://doi.org/10/BAB%20III.pdf

Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116

Published
2026-06-26