Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Guru atas Tindak Kekerasan terhadap Siswa Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia
Abstract
Education is a fundamental right of every citizen, with teachers playing a central role in the learning process and in shaping students' character. However, the increasing incidence of violence in schools and criminal reports filed against teachers while enforcing discipline have created significant legal issues. This study aims to examine the regulation of teachers’ criminal liability for acts of violence against students and to formulate a more ideal regulatory model for the future. The research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing statutory regulations and relevant legal concepts. The results indicate that regulations prohibiting violence against children are clearly established; however, they are not fully harmonized with regulations granting teachers the authority to discipline students. Consequently, teachers are often subjected to criminal proceedings without adequate consideration of the educational context and the element of culpability. This situation has reduced teachers’ ability and confidence to educate and shape students’ character effectively. The study concludes that a regulatory framework is needed that places criminal law as a measure of last resort (ultimum remedium), prioritizing resolution through ethical and administrative mechanisms before criminal sanctions are imposed. Such an approach would create a balance between protecting students and safeguarding the teaching profession.
References
Arrasyid, Y. (2021). (PDF) Book Review: Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi). ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v3i1.147
databoks.katadata.co.id. (2026). Kasus Kekerasan di Satuan Pendidikan RI Melonjak 604% Selama 2020-2025 | Pusat Data Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia | Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/pendidikan/statistik/69547c9480a55/kasus-kekerasan-di-satuan-pendidikan-ri-melonjak-604-selama-2020-2025
Fitira, A., Subekti, R., & Isharyanto, I. (2025). Kedudukan Rekomendasi Majelis Disiplin Profesi Sebagai Quasi-Penyelidikan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 32(3), 653–680. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art6
Hidayah, S. L., & Simarmata, L. N. (2026). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEKERASAN SEKSUAL ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 35 TAHUN 2014. Jurnal Lex Dirgantara, 3(1). https://jurnallppm.unsurya.ac.id/index.php/jld/article/view/339
Ibrahim, J. (2006). TEORI DAN METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF (cet. 2). Bayumedia Publishing. (Malang). //pustaka.sthg.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D1968
Ifriani, I., Hamnar, N. R., S, S. M., & Rama, B. (2024). Visi Misi UU RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen dalam Hubungannya dengan Evaluasi Pendidikan. ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(8), 574–573. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v3i8.4520
Istiqomah, Wasitaatmadja, F. F., & Achmad, S. (2020). Dialektika perlindungan hukum bagi guru dalam mendisiplinkan siswa di sekolah. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(1), 56–65.
Marzuki, P. D. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum: Abdulkadir Muhammad. Citra Aditya Bakti. https://www.belbuk.com/hukum-dan-penelitian-hukum/produk/54029
Permatasari, S. A., Aini, S. N., Nabila, U. S., & Saputra, D. N. (2025). Dari Pelanggar Menjadi Pelajar: Reorientasi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.1032
Prasetya, P. Y. M., Hartono, M. S., & Adnyani, N. K. S. (2023). ANALISIS YURIDIS FRASA MEMBIARKAN DALAM PASAL 76C UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 3(3), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.23887/jih.v3i3.2588
Rifai, A., & Meliala, A. J. (2022). Rekonstruksi pertanggungjawaban pidana dan aspek keperdataan dalam penggunaan dokumen yang dipalsukan. Proceeding Justicia Conference, 1, 15–36.
Riyadin, S. (2016). Kebijakan Pengembangan Profesionalisme Berkelanjutan Guru PNS: PNS Teacher Continuing Professionalism Development Policy. JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik), 4(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v4i2.697
Shantya, D., Ramdani, R., & Khosim, A. (2025). Disparitas Dispensasi Kawin dan Perlindungan Anak: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014. As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 7(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v7i3.9120
Sinaga, A. A. (2023). PELAKSANAAN KODE ETIK PROFESI GURU BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING. Jurnal Profesi Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(2). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ProfesiBK/article/view/54149
Sinaga, N. A. (2020). KODE ETIK SEBAGAI PEDOMAN PELAKSANAAN PROFESI HUKUM YANG BAIK. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460
Sujoko, A., & Hadi, A. (2024). PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK ADVOKAT DALAM PRAKTIK HUKUM DI INDONESIA; IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO. 18 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG ADVOKAT. Al-Kamal: Jurnal Kajian Islam, 4(2), 91–112.
Susan, & Zulkifli, A. (2022). PENGATURAN TENTANG PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. WASAKA HUKUM, 10(2), 80–95.
Suyanto, & Jihat, A. (2013). MENJADI GURU PROFESIONAL: Strategi Meningkatkan Kualifikasi dan Kualitas Guru di Era Global. Penerbit Erlangga.
wardhani, N. elysa, Sepriano, S., & Yani, R. S. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Widjaja, G., & Damun, D. (2024). Penegakan Hukum dan Implikasi Hukum Tindak Penganiayaan Berdasarkan Pasal 351 KUHP. (4.1). Bulletin of Community Engagement.
Copyright (c) 2026 Afrizal Afrizal, Sahuri Lasmadi, Elizabeth Siregar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















