INTEGRASI KECERDASAN BUATAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL: PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0
Abstract
The era of Society 5.0 presents new challenges and opportunities in the field of education, including in Social Studies (IPS) learning. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the learning process is expected to enhance the quality and relevance of education. This study aims to analyze the utilization of AI in Social Studies education, the opportunities it offers, the challenges encountered, and the optimization strategies that can be implemented. This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving Social Studies teachers at junior and senior high school levels. The findings reveal that AI plays a crucial role in personalizing learning, increasing student motivation, and presenting more contextual and engaging materials. However, challenges such as the digital divide, teacher competency readiness, and ethical issues regarding data use must be addressed. The proposed strategies include strengthening teacher training, improving technological infrastructure, and establishing ethical regulations for AI use in education. These findings emphasize that the integration of AI in Social Studies learning should aim not only at technological innovation but also at reinforcing social and humanistic values in line with the vision of Society 5.0.
References
BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2023). Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Indonesia 2023. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Future of Privacy Forum. (2020). Student privacy and the use of artificial intelligence. https://fpf.org/
Gee, J. P. (2008). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Japan Cabinet Office. (2019). Society 5.0. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Transformasi digital pendidikan Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Shin, D., Sutherland, L. M., & Shin, D. H. (2020). Gamified simulations and collaborative learning: Enhancing social studies through AI-based serious games. Computers & Education, 144, 103709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103709
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Perubahan sosial dan pendidikan: Pengantar pedagogik transformatif untuk Indonesia. Grasindo.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
