Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Penyalahgunaan Barcode dalam Pembelian BBM Bersubsidi menurut Fatwa DSN-MUI No. 110/DSN-MUI/IX/2017
Abstract
The misuse of barcode technology in the purchase of subsidized fuel (BBM) is still frequently observed, resulting in losses for consumers. This study aims to examine the protection of consumer rights according to the law in cases of barcode misuse in the purchase of subsidized fuel, based on DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 110/DSN-MUI/IX/2017. The research employs an empirical juridical method with a conceptual approach, in which the collected data were processed and analyzed using qualitative methods. The findings indicate various irregularities in the purchase of subsidized fuel, such as barcode forgery, duplicate barcode usage, and misuse of consumer data. The misuse of barcodes in the purchase of subsidized fuel not only violates positive law but also contravenes Sharia principles. This study emphasizes the importance of protecting consumer rights, including the right to obtain products and services fairly and in accordance with Sharia.
References
Abidin, M. Z. (2013). Konstitusionalitas kebijakan belanja subsidi bahan bakar minyak dalam Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2), 261–286.
Abu Dawud, S. B. A. A. As-Sijistani. (1994). Sunan Abu Dawud. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr.
Atsar, A., & Apriani, R. (2019). Buku ajar hukum perlindungan konsumen. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Badan Pengatur Hilir Minyak dan Gas Bumi (BPH Migas). (2025, Juli 3). BPH Migas pantau konsumsi BBM subsidi 3,4 juta pengguna MyPertamina. Retrieved from https://bphmigas.go.id
Badriyah, S. M. (2022). Sistem penemuan hukum dalam masyarakat prismatik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ballaji, N. (2024). Consumer Protection in the Era of Digital Payments: Legal Challenges and Solutions. Beijing L. Rev., 15, 1268., 15, 1268.15, 1268., 1268.
Charolina, O., Gustini, G., & Chantika, E. (2024). Pengaruh pelaksanaan QR Barcode My Pertamina terhadap penjualan BBM. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Nusantara, 3(1), 35–46.
Departemen Agama RI. (1986). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. Jakarta: Intermassa.
Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). (2017). Fatwa DSN-MUI No. 110/DSN-MUI/IX/2017 tentang akad jual beli. Jakarta: DSN-MUI.
Kamila, Z., & Efendi, R. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Kehilangan Saldo Pengguna E-Wallet Dana di Tinjau Dari Fatwa DSN MUI No. 16/Dsn Mui/Ix/2017 Tentang Uang Elektronik Syariah (Studi Kasus Pengguna E-Wallet Dana di Kecamatan Medan Tembung, Kota Medan). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7185-7193.
Maharani, A., & Dzikra, A. D. (2021). Fungsi perlindungan konsumen dan peran lembaga perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia: Perlindungan, konsumen dan pelaku usaha (literature review). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 2(6), 659–666.
Qabil, C. (2022). Sinergi tarik ulur kenaikan BBM, kebijakan stimulus perpajakan dan dampak ekonomi. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(3), 469–489.
Sudirjo, F., et al. (2023). Analisis dampak strategi pemasaran digital dalam meningkatkan loyalitas pelanggan: Perspektif industri e-commerce. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 7524–7532.
Taufik, M., & Zahara, F. (2024). Pengaturan perlindungan data pribadi dalam e-commerce menurut perspektif maqashid syariah (Studi kasus marketplace Facebook). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 6–15.
Tazkiyyaturrohmah, R. (2018). Eksistensi uang elektronik sebagai alat transaksi keuangan modern. Muslim Heritage, 3(1)
Trihafsari, W., & Permata, C. (2024). Consumer Protection in Beach Tourism Objects From the Perspective of Maqashid Sharia (Study in the Sub-District of Mirror Beach, Serdang Bedagai District). istinbath, 23(1)
Zulham. (2013). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisyah Sabrina Tanjung, Fatimah Zahara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
